41
edits
GMU:Einführung ins Programmieren mit Processing/Seminar (view source)
Revision as of 21:06, 10 November 2011
, 10 November 2011→Johannes Konrad Altmann
| Line 371: | Line 371: | ||
===Johannes Konrad Altmann=== | ===Johannes Konrad Altmann=== | ||
[[File:Asymmetrie_1.jpg|350px]]< | [[File:Asymmetrie_1.jpg|350px]]<br><br> | ||
[[File:Asymmetrie_2.jpg|350px]] | [[File:Asymmetrie_2.jpg|350px]] | ||
'''Asymmetric Balance!''' | '''Asymmetric Balance!''' | ||
Asymmetry means without symmetry. That by itself has nothing to do with balance. It just means that there are no mirror images in a composition. The term, however, is usually used to describe a kind of balance that does not rely on symmetry: asymmetrical balance. There is no simple formula for achieving balance in asymmetrical balance (hence the term informal balance) so the designer must sense whether or not the composition is balanced. This is where your sense of balance really comes into play. | |||
<br><br> | |||
The composition either looks like it is balance or it does not. Where does your attention goes when you look at an image? If it seems to wander around more or less evenly, there is probably balance. If you seem to always come back to the same area, and that is not the center of the composition, then the balance is suspect. | |||
<br><br> | |||
One way to achieve balance that is almost a formula is to have more or less equally interesting things randomly distributed throughout the format. The effect is like confetti dropped on the area. There is balance because interest is evenly distributed, and there is unity. The problem is that everything is likely to seem too equal and hence too uniform. There is not enough variety and the design soon becomes boring. | |||
= 11/11 = | = 11/11 = | ||