12,297
edits
GMU:Provokative Architektur/Jeremy Booth (view source)
Revision as of 14:54, 9 November 2012
, 9 November 2012no edit summary
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Jeremy Booth | workbook | Provocative Architecture== | |||
===statement 23.10.12=== | |||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
I would like to look at how ideas of tangible and intangible histories and cultural 'matierals' can be considered, interrogated, and reimagined, through strategies other than typical museum and/or collection-related, authorative positions. I'm particularly interested in ideas of interactivity and mobility. | I would like to look at how ideas of tangible and intangible histories and cultural 'matierals' can be considered, interrogated, and reimagined, through strategies other than typical museum and/or collection-related, authorative positions. I'm particularly interested in ideas of interactivity and mobility. | ||
===... elaboration as keyword/terms=== | |||
* intangible / tangible | * intangible / tangible | ||
* material / immaterial | * material / immaterial | ||
| Line 31: | Line 30: | ||
walking tour, Dresden | walking tour, Dresden | ||
===Revised statement 1=== | |||
In some ways, '''architecture can be as much a barrier to culture and heritage as a supporting mechanism for it'''. It can restrict access to tangible objects while creating an unessesary container for intangible ones. This is particularly the case when we need to pay entry to museums and art galleries, when their opening hours are restrictive, when they are crowded or unappealing, when they do not meet the needs of certain groups, and when collection items are not available for public viewing. As well, the need to 'build something' is sometimes not possible on sites of intrinsic cultural and historical value. | In some ways, '''architecture can be as much a barrier to culture and heritage as a supporting mechanism for it'''. It can restrict access to tangible objects while creating an unessesary container for intangible ones. This is particularly the case when we need to pay entry to museums and art galleries, when their opening hours are restrictive, when they are crowded or unappealing, when they do not meet the needs of certain groups, and when collection items are not available for public viewing. As well, the need to 'build something' is sometimes not possible on sites of intrinsic cultural and historical value. | ||
During the next weeks I will undertake a number of loose experiements around the idea of ''' 'barrier free' culture and heritage''' sites and initiatives. | During the next weeks I will undertake a number of loose experiements around the idea of ''' 'barrier free' culture and heritage''' sites and initiatives. | ||