184
edits
IFD:Nutzerstudien WiSe1314/Sicherheit endpresentation (security) (view source)
Revision as of 17:19, 2 March 2014
, 2 March 2014no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Aims of design | ==Aims of design== | ||
We questioned ourselves what we would expect of a secure chat design. First, it should be easy to handle, of course. It should provide an uncomplicated and plain interface, where you can figure out the functions fast and remember them for the next time. It’s essential to spare symbols that confuses the user or that are barely necessary by themselves. So we searched for some design ideas to answer the question: What can I do to guarantee a conveniant handling of the chat? | We questioned ourselves what we would expect of a secure chat design. First, it should be easy to handle, of course. It should provide an uncomplicated and plain interface, where you can figure out the functions fast and remember them for the next time. It’s essential to spare symbols that confuses the user or that are barely necessary by themselves. So we searched for some design ideas to answer the question: What can I do to guarantee a conveniant handling of the chat? | ||
Ideas | ==Ideas== | ||
We looked at the interface of the message window in perticular. People should immediatly see that it's a secure chat through its design. So we searched for possible symbols that provide security and tried out some designs to improve the current look of the chat. Examples had been locks and shields in many variations. We also tried out various colors to make clear the differences between functions. | We looked at the interface of the message window in perticular. People should immediatly see that it's a secure chat through its design. So we searched for possible symbols that provide security and tried out some designs to improve the current look of the chat. Examples had been locks and shields in many variations. We also tried out various colors to make clear the differences between functions. | ||
(Habt ihr da noch eure Bilder von?) | (Habt ihr da noch eure Bilder von?) | ||
How we prepared for interviews / our questions | ==How we prepared for interviews / our questions== | ||
For our interviews, we tried to choose open questions that don’t require a yes or no, but longer answers. So we would find out more about what our test subjects like or not. | For our interviews, we tried to choose open questions that don’t require a yes or no, but longer answers. So we would find out more about what our test subjects like or not. | ||
Main questions have been: | '''Main questions have been:''' | ||
What chats do you use? | * What chats do you use? | ||
Are you happy with them or would you want to improve something? | * Are you happy with them or would you want to improve something? | ||
Which functions are important for you? | * Which functions are important for you? | ||
Have you ever | * Have you ever think about the security in the chat programs? | ||
Are you feeling secure in your currently used chats? If no, did you restrict yourself in some way and how far? | * Are you feeling secure in your currently used chats? If no, did you restrict yourself in some way and how far? | ||
What are the limits of effort you would accept to feel safer in a chat? | * What are the limits of effort you would accept to feel safer in a chat? | ||
Have you ever been attacked before? | * Have you ever been attacked before? | ||
We interwiewed ten people of these courses of studies below. Since we all studies something similar we had an easy access to them. | We interwiewed ten people of these courses of studies below. Since we all studies something similar we had an easy access to them. | ||
Number | |||
Age class | {| class="wikitable" | ||
Course of studies | |- | ||
1 | ! Number | ||
< 20 | ! Age class | ||
Media Science | ! Course of studies | ||
2 | |- | ||
20 - 25 | | 1 | ||
Computer Science | | <20 | ||
3 | | Media Science | ||
20 - 25 | |- | ||
Business Economics | | 2 | ||
4 | | 20-25 | ||
20 - 25 | | Computer Science | ||
Computer Science | |- | ||
5 | | 3 | ||
20 - 25 | | 20-25 | ||
Computer Science | | Business Economics | ||
6 | |- | ||
20 - 25 | | 4 | ||
Computer Science | | 20-25 | ||
7 | | Computer Science | ||
20 - 25 | |- | ||
Computer Science and Media | | 5 | ||
8 | | 20-25 | ||
20 - 25 | | Computer Science | ||
Computer Science and Media | |- | ||
9 | | 6 | ||
20 - 25 | | 20-25 | ||
Media Arts/ Media Design | | Computer Science | ||
10 | |- | ||
25 - 30 | | 7 | ||
Game Design | | 20-25 | ||
| Computer Science and Media | |||
|- | |||
| 8 | |||
| 20-25 | |||
| Computer Science and Media | |||
|- | |||
| 9 | |||
| 20-25 | |||
| Media Arts/Media Design | |||
|- | |||
| 10 | |||
| 25-30 | |||
| Game Design | |||
|} | |||
Preparation for the interviews | Preparation for the interviews | ||