140
edits
Jan Glöckner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jan Glöckner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
sterilised and inoculated 3 petri dishes with Pleurotus strains from the peg on malt-medium. Transferred the original peg to one petri dish and kept one blank for controlling. All dishes are Potato-Dextrose-Agar-Medium. | sterilised and inoculated 3 petri dishes with Pleurotus strains from the peg on malt-medium. Transferred the original peg to one petri dish and kept one blank for controlling. All dishes are Potato-Dextrose-Agar-Medium. | ||
the tupperware pleurotus caught on in growing, but still is very restrained. | the tupperware pleurotus caught on in growing, but still is very restrained. | ||
19. November | |||
Pleurotus: all samples show good growth and no contamination. Cottony mycelium (typical for pleurotus ostreatus) is developing. | |||
The peg jar looks strange though. I rolled the peg around in the dish on the 17th. Now the surface of the medium shows the tracks of this action. But the developing organism looks rather yeasty than mycely. | |||
26.November | |||
All Pleurotus samples look very promising. The F1 generation samples are thriving. No contamination at all. Very soon the production of spawn can begin. The peg sample is now all cottony mycelium. So no yeasts, just the look of them. Maybe there are more of this early stage structures in the sample, or it is minor contamination. The control blank shows no sign of contamination. | |||
Inoculated on jar of LA-Bacteria-medium with kirby and cabbage kimchi samples. |
edits