385
edits
no edit summary
Marie EBEL (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Marie EBEL (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
Another critic that must be made is the huge confusion between ethnicity, nationality, regionalism, and religion. Basic common sense suffices to read the inaccuracy of this work. In fact, how does this company differ "Italian" from "Sicilian" ethnicity ? or how can it assumes that your personal faith (Jewish) will be written in your DNA ? Those amalgams highly discredit the work of this company, which is hard to believe made by scientists. | Another critic that must be made is the huge confusion between ethnicity, nationality, regionalism, and religion. Basic common sense suffices to read the inaccuracy of this work. In fact, how does this company differ "Italian" from "Sicilian" ethnicity ? or how can it assumes that your personal faith (Jewish) will be written in your DNA? Those amalgams highly discredit the work of this company, which is hard to believe made by scientists. | ||
[[File:MyHeritage critics1.jpg|300px]] | [[File:MyHeritage critics1.jpg|300px]] | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
[[File:23andmeResult.jpg|800px]] | [[File:23andmeResult.jpg|800px]] | ||
This second DNA test was quite similar to the first one surprisingly, except that it has acknowledged some French/German ancestors. Here again, we have a significant percentage of British/Scandinavian/Balkan heritage. What is interesting is the fact that I cannot confirm this result through my own knowledge regarding my family history (I was able to retrace my family tree over 2 centuries) but it seems that 2 different companies (that are then using a different database) had been able to come to the very same conclusion. | |||