560
edits
GMU:Sustainable Aesthetics/Betül Peker (view source)
Revision as of 16:49, 23 January 2023
, 23 January 2023no edit summary
Betulpeker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Betulpeker (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
When we consider the history of architecture, we could see that architecture is human-centric and gives an answer to human needs. Also, human being has a tendency to welcome "attractive" parts of nature in their life in indoor and outdoor spaces. They do this by creating solutions for building a relationship between nature and human-made structures. But what if we think about giving a place for living organisms to maintain their life and use architecture as a tool for them? This project speculatively approaches "architectural solutions" for physarum polycephalum and considers them as a "resident". | When we consider the history of architecture, we could see that architecture is human-centric and gives an answer to human needs. Also, human being has a tendency to welcome "attractive" parts of nature in their life in indoor and outdoor spaces. They do this by creating solutions for building a relationship between nature and human-made structures. But what if we think about giving a place for living organisms to maintain their life and use architecture as a tool for them? This project speculatively approaches "architectural solutions" for physarum polycephalum and considers them as a "resident". | ||
''References'' | ''References'' | ||