52
edits
IFD:Designing For Action/Nutzerforschung/BastianMarv (view source)
Revision as of 08:37, 14 February 2011
, 14 February 2011→1 interview
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Interview== | |||
===Questionnaire=== | |||
* Was studierst du? | * Was studierst du? | ||
* Wenn du eine interessante Webseite findest, wie stellst du sicher, dass du sie wiederfindest? | * Wenn du eine interessante Webseite findest, wie stellst du sicher, dass du sie wiederfindest? | ||
| Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
*bist du eher ein visueller, verbaler typ oder wie würdest du dich beschreiben? | *bist du eher ein visueller, verbaler typ oder wie würdest du dich beschreiben? | ||
==1 interview== | ===1 interview=== | ||
*[11/16/10 7:30:37 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:30:37 PM] bastian : nase und zunge helfen ja nicht weiter auf diesem gebiet | ||
*[11/16/10 7:30:43 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:30:43 PM] bastian : :) | ||
**[11/16/10 7:30:46 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:30:46 PM] Kristin : und: ich merk mir seiten, indem ich sie einfach in tabs offen lasse solange bis ich weiß, was ich daraus brauche oder was ich sonst damit machen will; es kann sein, dass ich bis zu 5 fenster mit zig tabs gleichzeitig auf habe | ||
*[11/16/10 7:31:07 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:31:07 PM] bastian : hmm interessant | ||
*[11/16/10 7:31:15 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:31:15 PM] bastian : das ist ein interessantes fakt | ||
**[11/16/10 7:31:34 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:31:34 PM] Kristin : ich muss alles "vor mir" haben | ||
*[11/16/10 7:31:39 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:31:39 PM] bastian : würdest du gerne ganze browsersessions bookmarken können? | ||
**[11/16/10 7:31:40 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:31:40 PM] Kristin : also nicht versteckt in nem menü | ||
**[11/16/10 7:31:50 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:31:50 PM] Kristin : kann man ja | ||
*[11/16/10 7:31:51 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:31:51 PM] bastian : ok | ||
**[11/16/10 7:31:54 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:31:54 PM] Kristin : das mach ich oft | ||
*[11/16/10 7:32:02 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:32:02 PM] bastian : ja aber nur für die anwendung | ||
**[11/16/10 7:32:18 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:32:18 PM] Kristin : stimmt nur für das aktuelle fenster | ||
*[11/16/10 7:32:21 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:32:21 PM] bastian : oder kann man mehrere sessions speichern | ||
*[11/16/10 7:32:32 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:32:32 PM] bastian : aus verschiedenen fenstern | ||
**[11/16/10 7:32:36 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:32:36 PM] Kristin : halt nur alle tabs in einem fenster | ||
**[11/16/10 7:32:38 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:32:38 PM] Kristin : nein | ||
**[11/16/10 7:32:49 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:32:49 PM] Kristin : nicht aus verschiedenen fenstern | ||
*[11/16/10 7:32:50 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:32:50 PM] bastian : und fändest du das praktisch? | ||
**[11/16/10 7:33:21 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:33:21 PM] Kristin : nö brauch ich nicht, weil sie fensterweise meistens eh eine einheit bilden und dann auch so geordnet bleiben können | ||
*[11/16/10 7:33:55 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:33:55 PM] bastian : gut aber neustarts werden so eirgendwie nervig oder nicht? | ||
**[11/16/10 7:34:21 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:34:21 PM] Kristin : welche neustarts? | ||
*[11/16/10 7:36:53 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:36:53 PM] bastian : naja wie sieht es mit den fenstern aus ewnn du deinen rechner neu starten müsstest... z.b. weil ich deine software ungefragt upgedatet habe | ||
**[11/16/10 7:38:02 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:38:02 PM] Kristin : ja klar, das kann nicht ewig offen bleiben, aber dann speicher ich alle tabs in einem ordner und nenne den ordner toSort oder so und öffne das, wenn ich nächstes mal damit arbeitet | ||
**[11/16/10 7:39:01 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:39:01 PM] Kristin : und lösch das dann auch, wenn ich es abgearbeitet hab | ||
*[11/16/10 7:39:37 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:39:37 PM] bastian : nice merci bien | ||
*[11/16/10 7:39:42 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:39:42 PM] bastian : madmoiselle | ||
*[11/16/10 7:39:50 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:39:50 PM] bastian : cetait une grande plaisire | ||
**[11/16/10 7:39:58 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:39:58 PM] Kristin : de rien | ||
**[11/16/10 7:40:11 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:40:11 PM] Kristin : a bientot | ||
*... | *... | ||
*[11/16/10 7:41:55 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:41:55 PM] bastian : mais tes contributions cettaient tres surprenante | ||
*[11/16/10 7:42:40 PM] bastian | *[11/16/10 7:42:40 PM] bastian : au-revoir je vais finire mes etudes | ||
**[11/16/10 7:42:53 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:42:53 PM] Kristin : qui qui | ||
**[11/16/10 7:43:04 PM] Kristin | **[11/16/10 7:43:04 PM] Kristin : oui? | ||
==2 interview== | ===2 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 76: | Line 78: | ||
**jaaaa, ich lasse mcih schwer dabei direkt kategoriesieren es lässt sich eher an der darstellung eines themas festmachen. | **jaaaa, ich lasse mcih schwer dabei direkt kategoriesieren es lässt sich eher an der darstellung eines themas festmachen. | ||
==3 interview== | ===3 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 101: | Line 103: | ||
**eher ein dialektischer typ. | **eher ein dialektischer typ. | ||
==4 interview== | ===4 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 125: | Line 127: | ||
**selbstanleser. | **selbstanleser. | ||
==5 interview== | ===5 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 150: | Line 152: | ||
**selber nachmachen typ - zuhören oder anschauen.... | **selber nachmachen typ - zuhören oder anschauen.... | ||
==6 interview== | ===6 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 175: | Line 177: | ||
**bei guter quali der quelle visueller typ | **bei guter quali der quelle visueller typ | ||
==7 interview== | ===7 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 200: | Line 202: | ||
**visuell | **visuell | ||
==8 interview== | ===8 interview=== | ||
*Was studierst du? | *Was studierst du? | ||
| Line 226: | Line 228: | ||
== | ==Evaluation== | ||
There are few points that are commonly stressed over all the 8 interview partners. | There are few points that are commonly stressed over all the 8 interview partners. | ||
We first want to start search behavior related issues: | ===We first want to start search behavior related issues:=== | ||
It turns out that all of the interview partners, rather remember content than design features of a document. This statement is equivalent to the claim that people rather know what they are looking for | It turns out that all of the interview partners, rather remember content than design features of a document. This statement is equivalent to the claim that people rather know what they are looking for | ||
than where it is. This can be compared to livingspace situation where you know what you're are looking for is the key, but you can't remember where they left them. Just after looking for a while without success we try to access second order information, like where did we have them last time et al. | than where it is. This can be compared to livingspace situation where you know what you're are looking for is the key, but you can't remember where they left them. Just after looking for a while without success we try to access second order information, like where did we have them last time et al. | ||
| Line 237: | Line 239: | ||
For document retrieval many rather use the browsing history or the addressbar. In the latter case hoping for autocompletetion to direct them to the questioned document. | For document retrieval many rather use the browsing history or the addressbar. In the latter case hoping for autocompletetion to direct them to the questioned document. | ||
==Secondly organization of Bookmarks:== | ===Secondly organization of Bookmarks:=== | ||
Impressively there exist people that keep the bookmarks folders organized and clean them up on a regular basis. But these People are rare, most interviewpartners claim that they have either ambiguous and inconsistent strategies when organizing their bookmarks. Many even report that they don't organize their bookmarks at all, leaving them with one huge folder that incorporates mostly all links at once. | Impressively there exist people that keep the bookmarks folders organized and clean them up on a regular basis. But these People are rare, most interviewpartners claim that they have either ambiguous and inconsistent strategies when organizing their bookmarks. Many even report that they don't organize their bookmarks at all, leaving them with one huge folder that incorporates mostly all links at once. | ||
| Line 243: | Line 245: | ||
Mostly limiting the role of bookmarks to the domain of being a shortcut-icon in the navigationbar to access pages that are visited on a regular basis, and by default, would need no bookmarking to be accessed the user. | Mostly limiting the role of bookmarks to the domain of being a shortcut-icon in the navigationbar to access pages that are visited on a regular basis, and by default, would need no bookmarking to be accessed the user. | ||
==Third usage and ascribed purpose:== | ===Third usage and ascribed purpose:=== | ||
There was loads of things that were annoying to our interview partners. For once the folder structure does in no way map conceptually to the interweb itself, making it hard to organize your documents in a manner that resembles their natural habitat. Secondly since bookmarks but not the documents selves are stored on the computer why do bookmarks still have such a static structure like treediagramms - bookmarks ought to be rather relational online entities to be shared and distributed. Third there are bookmark sharing tools but just as bookmarks they are annoying when making the bookmark itself. It is oftenly noted that creating bookmarks is itself an annoying process, because most people want just safe a link and than later wonder what to do about it. In these situations all the sorting into folders or even having to tag them, giving them es decription or category, appears to be bluntly annoying. The discomfort seems to emerge from a conceptual ascription where bookmarks are conceived to be a fast way storing links to pages that should be retrieved later on. This is no ill conceived function of bookmarks but the they way bookmarks are stored and ordered, organized and represented messes with this paradigm. | There was loads of things that were annoying to our interview partners. For once the folder structure does in no way map conceptually to the interweb itself, making it hard to organize your documents in a manner that resembles their natural habitat. Secondly since bookmarks but not the documents selves are stored on the computer why do bookmarks still have such a static structure like treediagramms - bookmarks ought to be rather relational online entities to be shared and distributed. Third there are bookmark sharing tools but just as bookmarks they are annoying when making the bookmark itself. It is oftenly noted that creating bookmarks is itself an annoying process, because most people want just safe a link and than later wonder what to do about it. In these situations all the sorting into folders or even having to tag them, giving them es decription or category, appears to be bluntly annoying. The discomfort seems to emerge from a conceptual ascription where bookmarks are conceived to be a fast way storing links to pages that should be retrieved later on. This is no ill conceived function of bookmarks but the they way bookmarks are stored and ordered, organized and represented messes with this paradigm. | ||
==Fourth general proposals for the better:== | ===Fourth general proposals for the better:=== | ||
*saving whole, multple browser session instead of single bookmarks. | *saving whole, multple browser session instead of single bookmarks. | ||
| Line 253: | Line 255: | ||
*sorting bookmarks by their semantic proximity in between the documents | *sorting bookmarks by their semantic proximity in between the documents | ||
*bookmarks arranged by the timeline | *bookmarks arranged by the timeline | ||
==Project proposal== | ==Project proposal== | ||
As stated before all search referrs to the content of interest within a document. In this way all search focuses primarily on something that is not represented within the bookmarks. Since the document is not stored whithin a bookmark it can likewise not be accesssed without internet connection. Our approach will therefor assume that an interweb connection is available. We then try to parse through the documents referrenced by the bookmarks and calculate some semantic proxemity, over the complete set of stored bookmarks. | As stated before all search referrs to the content of interest within a document. In this way all search focuses primarily on something that is not represented within the bookmarks. Since the document is not stored whithin a bookmark it can likewise not be accesssed without internet connection. Our approach will therefor assume that an interweb connection is available. We then try to parse through the documents referrenced by the bookmarks and calculate some semantic proxemity, over the complete set of stored bookmarks. the primary interface will feature a simple text inputfield where the searchterms are inserted to. Given searchterms we will then discard subsets that don't contain the terms within their body, thereby decreasing the cognitive visual load. The results will then be centered around the text input field indicating the accuracy of a result or confidence by a spacial proxemity in relation to the searchfield. We want also spacial proxemic representation in between the documents that qualify as a possible positive find in order to guide the attention of the searching user. | ||
The results should be representing the excerpt of the document that contained the querried term and the thumbnail of the documents page. | The results should be representing the excerpt of the document that contained the querried term and the thumbnail of the documents page. | ||