| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
====What is the essence of this solution?==== | ====What is the essence of this solution?==== | ||
'''brief explanation'''<br/> | '''brief explanation'''<br/> | ||
User can search pictures with CC licences (flickr, google, ...) with the program and they can also structure them. Additional information (licence, author, source, ...) of the image is stored locally on the computer and the user can decide to copy and paste an image with or without watermark.<br/> | User can search pictures with CC licences (e.g. flickr, google, ...) with the program and they can also structure them. Additional information (licence, author, source, ...) of the image is stored locally on the computer and the user can decide to copy and paste an image with or without watermark.<br/> | ||
'''more details...''' | '''more details...''' | ||
Revision as of 15:10, 26 May 2013
User Research
Research we did
- we were looking for arguments for and against Creative Commons on the internet
- we conducted some interviews
- we asked some pre-formulated questions and also some other during the interview
- pre-formulated questions were:
- Do you know Creative Commons? If yes, from where do you know it? In which way do you use it or why do you not use it?
- How do you licence your works?
- persons, who we have interviewed face-to-face:
- computer science student with facebook-account
- computer science and media student with facebook- and deviantart-account; she paints in her free time and publishes some scientific results to her university website; she corrected grammar and orthography in wikipedia articles
––Hi! Thanks for putting up the page. Could you please specify how you did the reserach? (which kind of people were interviewed?, Did you ask specific questions or were the interviews open?--JanD 11:16, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
Problems we identified
- some people have never heard Creative Commons or they knew little about it
- anti Gema movement, wikipedia
- people didn't use Creative Commons or they unconsciously use it (could you specify what "unconciously" means here? e.g. provide a brief example. --JanD 11:16, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
- example: Somebody writes an article or something else in wikipedia, but don't recognize that wikipedia stands under Creative Commons licence.
- people didn't know something of Creative Commons filter, which can be used for searching with google, youtube, ... (please link the filters, so one can check what you refer to. --JanD 11:16, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
- people saved images on the computer, but after a while they forgot the place, where the image was downloaded. I personaly find this a very interesting point. Is there any more to say about this? --JanD 11:16, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
We identified the following motivations and goals of users
We identified the following important acitvities
Our Ideas
1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES
What is the essence of this solution?
- Please specify the subquestions here. I know it can be tedious, but it helps to express the idea. If you have a good reason that this is otherwise, drop me a line, and I see how we can improve the questions template. --JanD 11:16, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
- post-hoc-remark: Essence means a very brief explanation; you can still show a more complex version here, but please explain your idea in 160Characters or 2 sentences too. (I added the remark to the tempate too--JanD 14:35, 26 May 2013 (CEST)
brief explanation
more details...
- problem of this solution: users do not want to pay credits for pictures without watermark, if they can download it without watermark elsewhere (e.g. flickr)
Why are current solutions unable to support users in this?
2. IMAGE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
What is the essence of this solution?
brief explanation
User can search pictures with CC licences (e.g. flickr, google, ...) with the program and they can also structure them. Additional information (licence, author, source, ...) of the image is stored locally on the computer and the user can decide to copy and paste an image with or without watermark.
more details...