205
edits
IFD:HumanCenteredDesignResearch SoSe13/team1 generalPresentation (view source)
Revision as of 14:07, 12 August 2013
, 12 August 2013→External Program
| (24 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* our criteria for selecting the interview participants was that people publish something on-line | * our criteria for selecting the interview participants was that people publish something on-line | ||
* we knew all people personally and so we also knew, that they publish something on-line | * we knew all people personally and so we also knew, that they publish something on-line | ||
* we were looking for participants with a Doodle List and the Piazza but unfortunately there were only a few people who contact us. | |||
* it was difficult to find people and specially professional artists, because you can't find very easy, who use Creative Commons and who not, if you don't know the interview participants | * it was difficult to find people and specially professional artists, because you can't find very easy, who use Creative Commons and who not, if you don't know the interview participants | ||
* we asked some pre-formulated questions | * we asked some pre-formulated questions but we also added some other during the interview | ||
* pre-formulated questions were: | * pre-formulated questions were: | ||
** Do you know Creative Commons? If yes, from where do you know it? In which way do you use it or why do you not use it? | ** Do you know Creative Commons? If yes, from where do you know it? In which way do you use it or why do you not use it? | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
** web designer | ** web designer | ||
* we recorded the interviews and made to ourselves a few written notes | * we recorded the interviews and made to ourselves a few written notes | ||
Firstly we limited our research on persons who had something do with CC. But there were not to many and so, after some time we recongnized that the persons we want to interview didn't directly had to do something with CC. It was also good to question these who do not know to much about CC and licenses. | |||
==Analysis== | ==Analysis== | ||
| Line 64: | Line 67: | ||
==Ideas== | ==Ideas== | ||
For the Ideas we took the data from our research and we wanted to remove the problems, which we found. For this each of us generated for himself ideas and than we took them together in a mindmap. | |||
===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES=== | ===1. TRADING PLACE FOR IMAGES=== | ||
[[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg | thumb | right | overview]] | [[File:Hcdr_team1_trading_place_idea.jpg | thumb | right | overview]] | ||
| Line 99: | Line 103: | ||
====Research Results==== | ====Research Results==== | ||
During the test of the prototype we identified the following problems: | We tested this prototyp with about seven persons. | ||
During the test of the prototype we identified that the probants had following problems: | |||
* some people didn't understand the workspace-path-menu | * some people didn't understand the workspace-path-menu | ||
* the function for exporting the files into an editing program was missing | * the function for exporting the files into an editing program was missing | ||
| Line 112: | Line 117: | ||
====External Program==== | ====External Program==== | ||
The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things. | The paper-mock-up of the external program is generated with the prototyping-tool Evolus Pencil Project. In this case we had some problems with printing, because the proportions wasn't correct and sometimes the program deleted some fields. All in all it was easier to generate the prototype with a prototyping tool than to draw all things. | ||
This is a revision of the first prototype and this are the new functions: | |||
* we added a new function to the search filter that people who don't know the CC-licenses can say for what they need the pictures; they search and the filter choose the licenses which are good for this. | |||
* the user can see the workspace and the search at the same time | |||
* a new function to see the data of the choosen pictures | |||
* a help function for the different licenses | |||
* better function to switch between workspaces | |||
<gallery> | |||
File:1st step.jpg | |||
File:2nd step.jpg | |||
File:main search1.jpg | |||
File:main search2.jpg | |||
</gallery> | |||
====Browser-Add-On==== | ====Browser-Add-On==== | ||
| Line 145: | Line 164: | ||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
In the end we can say, that it wasn't very difficult to generate and design the prototypes, but some prototyping-tools are better than others. In our case we had some problems with the program Pencil. With the program Balsamiq we haven't got some problems. | |||
Sometimes it was difficult to think at typical buttons, e.g. back-button, forward-button oder cancel-button. Also it wasn't easy to think like a user, who has other knowledge and experience than ourself. <br/> | |||
If we want to develop our browser-add-on idea more, we must make more tests, whether users like to use an add-on or not. Three tests aren't enough for a good research solution, but the time was limited. All in all the idea is great for an artist, because it make the daily work easier and he/she deals more with image-licenses. The next step would be a mid-fidelity-prototype, because users can interact better with them, especially the right-click-problem would be improved, because the users can try more with the program. | |||
==Our Presentations In The Course== | ==Our Presentations In The Course== | ||
During the course everyone held a presentation and in the following we want to say something about our experience and problems with our themes. | During the course everyone held a presentation and in the following we want to say something about our experience and problems with our themes. | ||
===Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration=== | ===Why it works (when it works): success factors in online creative collaboration=== | ||
In general it wasn't a big problem to give a lecture on this theme. Although one somehow confusing and discouraging aspect was the structure of text. The author repeated himself a lot in his essay. He summed up some aspects more than one time. In my presentation I was willing not to imitate the structure style of the author but in some points I had to repeat myself as well. | |||
==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap=== | ==="Intuitivität" Intuitive = Familiar, The Intuition Gap=== | ||
It was not a big problem to make a presentation on this theme. The sources were very good and easy to understand although the topic was not new for me because I had it before in an other course. I only had problems with the decision which example of Intuitive I present but than I took them from the sources. I think that now eveyone who saw the presentation know what Intuitive and the Intuition Gap is. | |||
===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery=== | ===Prototyping-Tools: Pencil, jQuery=== | ||
Download-Link: [http://webuser.uni-weimar.de/~quyu4945/Dokumente/Prototyping-Tools.pdf Prototyping Tools] (german presentation) <br/> | |||
It was hard for me to decide, which prototype-tools I want to present and which one not. A reason for this is, that everyone must decide self which program is good for his/her project. Pencil and jQuery are only two from a lot of tools. So I decided to name a lot of tools and present only 2-3 more in detail. I tested a lot of programs on his advantages and disadvantages, because I wanted to see the limits of every tool. My own goal was, that the others have a little overview of the existing prototyping-tools and maybe also that they can decide which one is good for their own idea. | |||