| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Data Gathering: Interviews/Observation == | == Data Gathering: Interviews/Observation == | ||
We interwiewed ten people of these courses of studies below, because we had an easy access to them. We asked them about their chat behavior in general and especially how they think about security. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
| Line 58: | Line 56: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Fragen: (doppelte werden gelöscht) | |||
* Are you feeling secure in your currently used chat programs? | |||
* What are the limits of effort you would accept to feel safer in a chat? | |||
== Data Analysis == | == Data Analysis == | ||
Revision as of 14:59, 12 December 2013
Aims of data gathering
… are to improve the design and/or functions in Chat-Secure, regarding the security-problem.
what did you ask? Where there any outlines? A more specific focus?
--JanD 09:33, 12 December 2013 (CET)
Data Gathering: Interviews/Observation
We interwiewed ten people of these courses of studies below, because we had an easy access to them. We asked them about their chat behavior in general and especially how they think about security.
| Number | Age class | Course of studies |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | <20 | Media Science |
| 2 | 20-25 | Computer Science |
| 3 | 20-25 | Business Economics |
| 4 | 25-30 | Computer Science and Media |
| 5 | 20-25 | Computer Science and Media |
| 6 | 20-25 | Computer Science and Media |
| 7 | 20-25 | Computer Science and Media |
| 8 | 20-25 | Computer Science and Media |
| 9 | 20-25 | Media Arts/Media Design |
| 10 | 25-30 | Game Design |
Fragen: (doppelte werden gelöscht)
- Are you feeling secure in your currently used chat programs?
- What are the limits of effort you would accept to feel safer in a chat?
Data Analysis
How we analysed the data: We searched for specific answers in the interviews and looked how it could help to spot a problem. Then we put all our results together and created a affinity diagramm.
Main Results Data Analysis
What we learned from our user research: We got a lot of information about the requirements and the possible use of a chat application. The most important features people wanted to be part of such an application where group chat functionality, image transfer, smileys and an easy to use but appealing interface. People often want to plan partys in a chat, so the group function could be necessary. The image transfer is an important factor of communication for most people and chatting is more fun, when design elements, e.g. smileys, have a good appearence. It was also interessting for us to find out that the main percentage of the users know about possible security issues:
- fear of being in a computer surveillance/being watched in general
- fear of theft of an account/a mobile device
- e.g. personal messages were posted on the pinboard because of a Facebook bug
However, they did not try to find an alternative. Related to this we also found out that people using chat software for business had much more concerns about their personal information and especially the topic and content of the talk then the private users.
_______
What were the security issues the people knew about? What was their concept of 'security'?
What were the users aims in using a group chat, an image transfer etc.?
--JanD 09:33, 12 December 2013 (CET)
What specifc problem we want to solve
In our opinion the interface should communicate security to the user. Therefor we want to improve the interface of ChatSecure in a way, that everyone is possible to understand what is meant with the symbols.
Plans – how we want to solve the problem(s)
We drew some designs on a paper regarding the message window and discussed them. Then we tested the idea on a comrade who wasn`t in our working group. It worked quite well, but not perfectly understandable, so we want to extend the idea in the next week. When we finish this, we would try to solve the next problem.
Could you provide any Methods how you want to archive this? E.g. Analysis of competition, tests etc? Is your concern only directed at the icons? And what is bad about the current ones than?
--JanD 09:38, 12 December 2013 (CET)