GMU:Urban Development Kit/The Invaders: Difference between revisions

We are pleased to share with you what the suspect had to say while under custody:

C: Let's assume you are innocent and this is just the biggest coinsidence in the history of mankind. Tell us what is the idea behind your works?

D: Well, architectural structures open a wide field about social identity and the transformation of it. Duration of transformation of this identity, requires need for rapid production whereat raises comprehensive commodification. When creating my works by taking into account this process, I divide each of them into parts. Bringing references from real-world objects to this irrational space.

C: But why?

D: Because I am tired of seeing only-function oriented dirty, soulles cement blocks everywhere I go. You are where you live! We live in matchboxes! I just wanted to say something about it by creating a realm like this new composition-fiction, that does not propose a space that any individual can step on, or can include his life. By deranging and decomposing, by abstracting  these structures from their functions, I present them without bringing a new proposal. To undermine the existing order, I can say I subjected them with a form and colour dominant recreating situation. This way I presented my attitude on ‘stacking’ phenomenon of modern architecture. Creating this disfunctional realm is my anarchic attitude towards only-function depending structure build. Now they got real. I never intended this but here is where we are. They are among us..

C: Hmm.. This says someting. So tell me, how in the HELL do we get rid of it all?

D: I honestly have no idea how these things you call invaders came to be. But if this is somehow connected to my works, we reaaaally gotta get rid of those shopping malls.

C: Damn.

D: Yeah.