IFD:Computational Thinking-SoS16/EvaluationRubric: Difference between revisions

From Medien Wiki
(Created page with "''''Computational Thinking: Evaluation Rubric''''' Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric: 30% Attendance and Participation<br /> 30% Wee...")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''''Computational Thinking: Evaluation Rubric'''''
'''''Computational Thinking: Evaluation Rubric'''''


Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric:
Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

Latest revision as of 12:22, 15 February 2017

Computational Thinking: Evaluation Rubric

Candidates in this module will be evaluated according to the following rubric:

30% Attendance and Participation
30% Weekly Assignments (including Midterm Presentation)
40% Final Deliverable and Documentation (including Final Presentation)


Please ensure that your written work adheres to accepted academic standards, with regard to citation and integration of external sources.
The Interface Design Group maintains a zero-tolerance policy for plagiarism and academic dishonesty.

Acknowledging Sources (Univ. of Wisconsin)
What is Plagiarism?