GMU:Bild zu Ton, Ton zu Bild/Projekte: Difference between revisions

From Medien Wiki
Line 62: Line 62:


'''Kandinsky''', because one of his focus was to translate music by painting, or at least to paint like a composer. His forms, lines, colors act like interruptions, pieces of rhythms, notes, and give a feeling of music in one picture. I could say that my goal  would be to recreate a kind of living Kandinsky's painting, but there is a big difference between his work and my project, even bigger than the question of movement itself : the '''composition'''. The pictures of Kandinsky are over-composed, really calculated, whereas with computer generating imagery, I can only get a '''random result''', I mean in the way I use it. Here I just can configurate some possible kinds of forms, movements or colors, but the way they appear (''size, appearence, location, RGB result or opacity'') depends of music and computer more than me. So I can't chose exactly the result, and plan a composition.
'''Kandinsky''', because one of his focus was to translate music by painting, or at least to paint like a composer. His forms, lines, colors act like interruptions, pieces of rhythms, notes, and give a feeling of music in one picture. I could say that my goal  would be to recreate a kind of living Kandinsky's painting, but there is a big difference between his work and my project, even bigger than the question of movement itself : the '''composition'''. The pictures of Kandinsky are over-composed, really calculated, whereas with computer generating imagery, I can only get a '''random result''', I mean in the way I use it. Here I just can configurate some possible kinds of forms, movements or colors, but the way they appear (''size, appearence, location, RGB result or opacity'') depends of music and computer more than me. So I can't chose exactly the result, and plan a composition.
[[File:Example.jpg]]
[[File:compositionVIII.jpg]]