mNo edit summary |
(added my comments) |
||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
** The user wants to send out photos/videos. | ** The user wants to send out photos/videos. | ||
** The user likes to express its emotion with a lot of smileys. | ** The user likes to express its emotion with a lot of smileys. | ||
** The function "writes..." is not necassary. | ** The function "writes..." is not necassary. <div style="color:brown">not quite sure what this is, could you elaborate on it?</div>--[[User:Hans|Hans]] 21:35, 18 December 2013 (CET) | ||
* Security | * Security | ||
** It would be useful to have a password for the app. | ** It would be useful to have a password for the app. | ||
** To feel | ** To feel safe, the user desires to have a security warranty. | ||
** It is important that apps are immune from viruses. | ** It is important that apps are immune from viruses. | ||
** Important information, link, photos, videos, … are often sent by E-Mail. | ** Important information, link, photos, videos, … are often sent by E-Mail. | ||
| Line 108: | Line 109: | ||
<div style="color:blue">I tried to phrase and explain some points in another way. Is it ok? [M.E.]</div> | <div style="color:blue">I tried to phrase and explain some points in another way. Is it ok? [M.E.]</div> | ||
<div style="color:brown">Definitely some interesting results here, it sounds like people are interested in security and are trying to figure out ways to increase their own security. It would be quite valuable to explore ideas of how people represent their concerns, and how they aim to increase their own security. About Authenticity, its a hard concept in computers. I think most computer users don't understand that its easy to fake messages. My guess is that people are concerned about it, but don't really understand the technical issues so they assume things they receive are what they seem to be. A parallel test on this topic could be very illuminating, like showing users how to generate fake emails, messages, etc. to make them appear they are coming from someone they trust. Also, I'm not quite sure what the point of view of all of these bullet points are. Are they from the person running the tests, or are the things that the users in the tests communicated? My guess is that they are all summaries of things communicated from the users.</div>--[[User:Hans|Hans]] 21:35, 18 December 2013 (CET) | |||
'''What specific problem we want to solve''' | |||
'''What | |||
We want to solve some problems with the login-process and make it easier to use. | We want to solve some problems with the login-process and make it easier to use. | ||
| Line 119: | Line 120: | ||
<div style="color:blue">We really focus on the sign up process. There is the problem that you don't get an advice to enter the password but it is nessacary. The process is very inconvenient, it needs to many steps till you can start to chat so that we want to create an easier way. [M.E.]</div> | <div style="color:blue">We really focus on the sign up process. There is the problem that you don't get an advice to enter the password but it is nessacary. The process is very inconvenient, it needs to many steps till you can start to chat so that we want to create an easier way. [M.E.]</div> | ||
<div style="color:brown">I think this is important work since the process is currently confusing, but also complicated so its not easy to fix the usability issues. But its also not such a huge task, so you should be able to get solid results in the time you have in this class.</div>--[[User:Hans|Hans]] 21:35, 18 December 2013 (CET) | |||
| Line 150: | Line 153: | ||
Our first prototype for the login process. | Our first prototype for the login process. | ||
<div style="color:brown">The difficult part here is that there is no known way of making a secure, private connection without some kind of login process. WhatsApp's uses an automatically generated password that it is not hard for a malicious user to generate, getting full access to the whole account. So its security is very poor, but its usability is great. As far as I know, Facebook does require a login, but it just handles it well and it only happens once really. Facebook is probably a better example here. It probably makes the most sense to compare the Facebook mobile app's first time setup/login procedure with ChatSecure's Facebook login procedure. Then additionally, it would be great to see a comparison of other apps like ChatSecure that allow users to use a wide variety of accounts (Xabber, Beem, etc.) </div>--[[User:Hans|Hans]] 21:35, 18 December 2013 (CET) | |||