51
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
File:Collection of bags according to composition.jpg | File:Collection of bags according to composition.jpg | ||
File:Sterilizing the bags.jpg | File:Sterilizing the bags.jpg | ||
File:mixture in the bag.jpg | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 72: | Line 73: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:mycel texture.jpg | |||
File:Soft surface of the block.jpg | File:Soft surface of the block.jpg | ||
File:The internal structure of the cut element_1.jpg | File:The internal structure of the cut element_1.jpg | ||
Line 102: | Line 104: | ||
<gallery> | <gallery> | ||
File:Uncontrolled growth on rye substrate.jpg | File:Uncontrolled growth on rye substrate.jpg | ||
File:foam_1.jpg | |||
File:foam_2.jpg | |||
</gallery> | </gallery> | ||
Line 142: | Line 146: | ||
During the pressure tests, the compressive strength of the test cubes of each mixture was revealed. A significant difference is that the general substrate, i.e. the mixture consisting of four materials, can carry almost twice as much load as straw alone. This is due to the larger particle size of the straw and its natural tubular design, as a result of which a lower density was achieved, which also greatly affected the compressive strength. If the straw is ground to a smaller size, it could certainly compete with the density of the one made with hemp. | During the pressure tests, the compressive strength of the test cubes of each mixture was revealed. A significant difference is that the general substrate, i.e. the mixture consisting of four materials, can carry almost twice as much load as straw alone. This is due to the larger particle size of the straw and its natural tubular design, as a result of which a lower density was achieved, which also greatly affected the compressive strength. If the straw is ground to a smaller size, it could certainly compete with the density of the one made with hemp. | ||
[[File:mycel_block.jpg|400px]] |
edits