205
edits
IFD:HumanCenteredDesignResearch SoSe13/team1 generalPresentation (view source)
Revision as of 15:11, 11 August 2013
, 11 August 2013→Conclusion
m (→Conclusion) |
|||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
===Conclusion=== | ===Conclusion=== | ||
In the end we can say, that it wasn't very difficult to generate and design the prototypes, but some prototyping-tools are better than others. In our case we had some problems with the program Pencil. With the program Balsamiq we haven't got some problems. | In the end we can say, that it wasn't very difficult to generate and design the prototypes, but some prototyping-tools are better than others. In our case we had some problems with the program Pencil. With the program Balsamiq we haven't got some problems. | ||
Sometimes it was difficult to think at typical buttons, e.g. back-button, forward-button oder cancel-button. Also it wasn't easy to think like a user, who has other knowledge and experience than ourself. <br/> | Sometimes it was difficult to think at typical buttons, e.g. back-button, forward-button oder cancel-button. Also it wasn't easy to think like a user, who has other knowledge and experience than ourself. <br/> | ||
If we want to develop our browser-add-on idea more, we must make more tests, whether users like to use an add-on or not. Three tests aren't enough for a good research solution, but the time was limited. All in all the idea is great for an artist, because it make the daily work easier and he/she deals more with image-licenses. | If we want to develop our browser-add-on idea more, we must make more tests, whether users like to use an add-on or not. Three tests aren't enough for a good research solution, but the time was limited. All in all the idea is great for an artist, because it make the daily work easier and he/she deals more with image-licenses. | ||