474
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
According to science, there's no written, or carved symbols or anything that any non-human species has developed as a tool for communication. But, animals have a number of in-born qualities they use to signal their feelings, but these are not like the formed words we see in the human language. Countless species like bears, dogs, many insects, snakes, and cats do use chemical markings and pheromones for certain purposes. Some animals leave detailed messages for members of their own (and in some cases other) species by marking an object or the ground with a bodily excretion. | According to science, there's no written, or carved symbols or anything that any non-human species has developed as a tool for communication. But, animals have a number of in-born qualities they use to signal their feelings, but these are not like the formed words we see in the human language. Countless species like bears, dogs, many insects, snakes, and cats do use chemical markings and pheromones for certain purposes. Some animals leave detailed messages for members of their own (and in some cases other) species by marking an object or the ground with a bodily excretion. | ||
The has been scientific intentions to teach animals the human lenguaje. One of the most contested examples is Nim Chimpsky, a chimpanzee named after noted linguist Noam Chomsky, who was taught over 100 signs in sign language in the '70s. Turning hand gestures into meaning certainly displays arbitrariness. But Herbert Terrace, the psychology that led the study doubted that Nim had really learned a language. He noted that Nim very rarely signed spontaneously; instead, he would react to signs his teacher was making. | The has been scientific intentions to teach animals the human lenguaje. One of the most contested examples is Nim Chimpsky, a chimpanzee named after noted linguist Noam Chomsky, who was taught over 100 signs in sign language in the '70s. Turning hand gestures into meaning certainly displays arbitrariness. But Herbert Terrace, the psychology that led the study doubted that Nim had really learned a language. He noted that Nim very rarely signed spontaneously; instead, he would react to signs his teacher was making. | ||
Bacteria for example communicates thought chemicals, they expel one molecule of diferente kinds of chemicals in order to express some need to the group. They need communication because they need to carry on tasks that are impossible to do by just one individual, so as we they express desires to they can achieve goals. | Bacteria for example communicates thought chemicals, they expel one molecule of diferente kinds of chemicals in order to express some need to the group. They need communication because they need to carry on tasks that are impossible to do by just one individual, so as we they express desires to they can achieve goals. |
edits