COMPROMISED VISIONS “Lately, she’s been seeing things differently”

Issue No. 2/2023
COMPROMISED VISIONS:
“Lately, she’s been seeing things differently”

.

EDITORIAL

— – — – – — — — – — —

.

.

“Late­ly, she’s been see­ing things differently”

.

Who is she, though? A prophet, awok­en, touched by God? A new­ly elect­ed leader of the peo­ple on a quest to over­throw kings? A queen, tired of the car­nage, now keen on striv­ing for peace? An under­fund­ed ambi­tious sci­en­tist who has final­ly put it all togeth­er under her micro­scope or a scared con­fused child, trem­bling under the cov­ers after a haunt­ing dream? 

.

Is she even human? Maybe she’s the lens at the back of a sniper’s rifle, hav­ing sec­ond thoughts while the com­man­der is yelling take the bloody shot? Or maybe the sniper is a revamped drone called Lucy, that can assess all alone, the col­lat­er­al dam­age of a locked-on target?

.

Depend­ing on where she’s stand­ing, all these may apply. Depend­ing on how she looks at it. And the odd thing about it all is that she might not even have eyes. And yet she sees quite fine. 

.

Does her vision make her weak­er or ten times stronger? Is her “see­ing dif­fer­ent­ly” a mark of exclu­sion or a sign of divin­i­ty? Is it a dis­tor­tion or an aug­men­ta­tion? Vision can mean delu­sion or fore­sight, it can imply a whole­some grasp or a par­tial glance through a crack; a col­lec­tive pic­ture put togeth­er by a frag­ment­ed many, or a collective’s blind faith in a sin­gle p.o.v that binds them.

.

By now, vision is such a preva­lent metaphor that it can be all these things at once. More than any­thing, it implies one’s posi­tion, one’s cir­cum­stance and situation—and one’s abil­i­ty to inter­pret situations—within a dynam­ic of power—a dynam­ic that often­times dates way-way back.

.

Here’s what a few vision­ar­ies said about vision:

“The field of vision has always seemed to me com­pa­ra­ble to the ground of an archae­o­log­i­cal exca­va­tion.”  Paul Vir­ilio

“Vision is always a ques­tion of the pow­er to see – and per­haps of the vio­lence implic­it in our visu­al­iz­ing prac­tices. With whose blood were my eyes craft­ed?” Don­na Haraway

.

So with all that in mind, when a vision­ary nego­ti­ates, when she set­tles, is she more prag­mat­ic, more cal­cu­lat­ed? Or does it mean she lost her edge, is her vision now impaired, not as sharp? In oth­er words, what exact­ly are “com­pro­mised visions”? Then again, what types of vision aren’t? 

.

We admit, as an edi­to­r­i­al team, we so far couldn’t meet around one world­view. The way we see it, though? It’s up to you to show us.

— – — – – — — — – — — –

.

.

In the sec­ond issue of Work­ing Titles, we asked the widest array of both aca­d­e­m­ic or non-aca­d­e­m­ic con­trib­u­tors to respond to this provo­ca­tion, for­mu­lat­ed above, which lies some­where between poet­ry and elu­ci­da­tion. Out of the count­less pro­pos­als we col­lect­ed, we now present 14 contributions. 

— – — – – — — — – — — – — – – — —

.

.

Edi­to­r­i­al team for issue No. 02:
Xenia Mura Fink, Angela Matthies, Ann-Kathrin Müller, Gabriel S Moses

.

Sup­port­ed by Bauhaus-Uni­ver­sität Weimar, Pro­fes­sor­ship Arts and Research

.

Pub­lished by Work­ing Titles, c/o Bauhaus-Uni­ver­sität Weimar, Ph.D. Studiengang

.

Kun­st und Design, Geschwis­ter-Scholl-Straße 7, 99423 Weimar

– — — – — — – – — –

– — — – — — – –

.

.

.

For issue No. 1, go here